Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Canadian Cancer Centre - How to make a Donation

Donations 

Canadian Cancer Center Initiative
of
The Nancy-Griffon Foundation of Canada

For the great many of you who after years ands years of effort are growing tired of raising funds for children’s cancer programmes and watching those same funds eagerly taken into those various hospitals supposedly dedicated to children’s health only to see those same funds year after year drawn into general operating cash flows to pay for the bloated salaries, some ranging in the millions and capital costs again in the millions with so very little - about 13 cents on the dollar - being used for “applied research” - then we ask that you join The Nancy-Griffon Foundation’s initiative for the Canadian Cancer Center. All funds are directed to applied medical research efforts and the direct costs of children going to the hospital. 

In alignment the with the commentary on our website www.nancygriffonfund.com and the associated Blog site www.canadiancancercenter.blogspot.com we ask that you please follow the instructions below in order to make your donation today to The Nancy-Griffon Foundation in support of its initiative - The Canadian Cancer Center. ® 
Thank you.  

Please send your drafts or money orders to:

The Nancy-Griffon Foundation
Canadian Cancer Center Initiative
53 Brookwood Drive, Suite 100
Barrie, Ontario
L4N 0Z1


The Canadian Cancer Centre is a private sector initiative of The NANCY-GRIFFON Foundation of Canada to bring about the required funding for paediatric leukaemia care dealing with the cure for paediatric leukaemia with the use of the patient's white blood cells combined with either their T-Cells or B-Cells in conjunction with a biopsy of the cancer. The treatment through the use of white blood cells is to treat cancer for what is really is - a virus - and hence the name oncology. There is now radiology or burn treatment or chemotherapy which radically reduced the patient's auto-immune system - AND equally important for the patient - there are no side effects. 

We urgently ask for your assistance and your financial support for this private initiative of The NANCY GRIFFON Foundation and The MACKLIN MEDICAL MISSION of Canada. Your donation would be sincerely appreciated.  Thank you.



Eric J. Macklin   MBA., FICB, FCSI, FMA, UE
Chairman
The Macklin Medical Mission    [Est 1886]
The Nancy-Griffon Foundation [Est 1975]
The Canadian Cancer Centre Initiative
Website: www.canadiancancercenter.blogspot.com


© The Nancy-Griffon Foundation. All rights reserved.

The Canadian Cancer Centre ® is an private sector initiative of The Nancy-Griffon Foundation (NGF), 1. CRS, 2. a tax exempt charitable organization. 53 Brookwood Drive, Suite 100, Barrie, Ontario, L4N0Z1

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Canadian Cancer Centre - The Cure for Leukaemia is Here

Why - The Dark Ages of Cancer Treatment
Newsletter 

In our continuing series in regards to cancer treatments and in terms of medical treatment for cancer patients we are as we stand today in the dark ages of patient care and treatment. Its a the Black Hole of Medicine into which all cancer patients are currently drawn into - just follow the money. The cancer industry destroys or marginalizes safe and effective cures while promoting their patented, expensive, and toxic remedies that do more harm than good. The treatment cost in the United States from Stage One to Stage 4 costs approximately $480.000 to $1.5 million per patient. In Canada the same course of treatment run from Stage One to Stage Four will cost anywhere from $125,000 to $250,000. Its time to stop this nonsense.

No chemotherapy drug has ever actually cured or resolved the underlying causes of cancer. Even what mainstream medicine considers "successful" chemotherapy treatments are only managing symptoms, usually at the cost of interfering with other precious physiological functions in patients that will cause side effects down the road. There is no such thing as a drug without a side effect.

This is an article from CancerCures.com October dated 2014 and bears repeating. It's a message that we at the Macklin Medical Mission supported by the Nancy-Griffon Foundation have been repeating ourselves since early 1978. We are obviously not alone in expressing our concerns and our assessment of what passes today as cancer treatments. The cost load on our respective public health care systems are unduly excessive and have been for many decades.

Chemotherapy and Radiation May Kill Cancer, But They Also Kill You

Chemotherapy has a number of post-treatment adverse effects. Most chemotherapeutic agents do enter the brain and they can directly and indirectly produce a number of acute and delayed changes to the central nervous system. These effects can last for years, then dissipate, or, when they occur in young children, can cause endless ripples of side effects well into adulthood.

The long-term survival rates of chemotherapy patients are grossly exaggerated by the medical fraternity and knowingly so because most of these patients end up dying of diseases unrelated to the original cancer itself, but instead related to the treatment and the destructive nature of the “treatment” to the auto-immune system.

Chemotherapy drugs (especially alkylating agents) are known to cause either the spread of cancer or other cancers including leukaemia many of these drugs fall into this class. Alkylating agents directly damage DNA of ALL cells. These agents are not phase-specific; in other words, they work in all phases of the cell cycle. Because these drugs damage DNA, they can cause long-term damage to the bone marrow and consequently affect long-term immunity. With these drugs, the risk for a second cancer develops slowly over time but their diagnosis is inevitable. Studies have shown that the risk begins to rise about two years after treatment, is highest about five to 10 years after treatment. It's the reason most chemotherapy patients die 10-15 years after treatment.

Radiation therapy can also increase the risk of developing cancer in the vast majority of patients. The types of cancers linked to radiation therapy are vast, but primarily consist of leukaemia and sarcomas. These cases typically develop a few years after radiation exposure with the peak of risk being about five to nine years after exposure. Again, most patients that pursue radiation (around since 1886) therapy develop secondary cancers related to treatment and not as a consequence of the original cancer. Radiation-induced cancers have exploded in the past two decades ever since radiation has proliferated as a treatment, usually secondary to chemotherapy.
Some other cancer risks are tied to radiation therapy, as well. Solid tumours can develop at or near the site of the radiation exposure even 10 or more years after the radiation therapy. These risks seem to be greatest in certain areas of the body, such as the breast, the thyroid and the lymph nodes. In some of these cases, your age at the time of radiation treatment plays a major role - especially the young the old. For example, younger breast cancer patients are more likely to develop a secondary cancer from radiation therapy than older breast cancer patients. 

Bottom Line: Current Cancer Treatment Kills

More than 60% of all cancer patients suffer significant treatment-related toxicity. Treatment can also result in life-threatening infections or patients may simply die of their cancer. 

When asked about how to improve a patient's response and outcome, Nelson replied "alternatively, it may be possible to use smaller, less toxic doses of therapy." 

But small doses of poison are still poison.

The bottom line is that chemotherapy destroys virtually all cells and systems before getting to the actual cancer. This means your central nervous system, organ systems and your immune system (to name just a few) are all seriously compromised and remain so years after the treatment has subsided. Forget about cancer killing you because chemotherapy sponsored and pushed by the pharmaceutical companies will do a much much better job in the long term. 

The on-going toxicity of chemotherapy causes healthy brain cells to die off long after treatment has ended and may be one of the underlying biological causes of the cognitive side effects -- or "chemo brain" -- that so many cancer patients experience.
Conventional cancer treatment is a massive and expensive fraud--a non-treatment that sickens and kills more people than it ever "cures." It can never cure anything because it poisons the body which only causes more disease and infections well into the future.

Your choice now is very simple – both you the private citizen and the private corporation can decide who and what to fund. The ethics are also simple – choose “inept” or “adept”. Thank you.

The Canadian Cancer Centre is a private sector initiative of The NANCY-GRIFFON Foundation of Canada to bring about the required funding for paediatric leukaemia care dealing with the cure for paediatric leukaemia with the use of the patient's white blood cells combined with either their T-Cells or B-Cells in conjunction with a biopsy of the cancer. The treatment through the use of white blood cells is to treat cancer for what is really is - a virus - and hence the name oncology. There is now radiology or burn treatment or chemotherapy which radically reduced the patient's auto-immune system - AND equally important for the patient - there are no side effects. 

We urgently ask for your assistance and your financial support for this private initiative by The Macklin Medical Mission and The NANCY-GRIFFON Foundation of Canada would be sincerely appreciated.  

For our address and donation form we refer you to our website shown below. In addition should you the reader or your group wish to hear more about the new cure for cancer please contact us to arrange for a speaking engagement. 
Thank you.

Eric J. Macklin   MBA., FICB, FCSI, FMA, UE
Chairman
The Macklin Medical Mission    [Est 1886]
The Nancy-Griffon Foundation [Est 1975]
The Canadian Cancer Centre Initiative
Website: www.canadiancancercenter.blogspot.com
Website: www.nancygriffonfund.com




© The Nancy-Griffon Foundation. All rights reserved.

The Canadian Cancer Centre is an initiative of The Nancy-Griffon Foundation (NGF), 1. CRS, 2. a tax exempt organization. Address: 53 Brookwood Drive, Suite 100, Barrie, Ontario, L4N0Z1

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Cancer - Why It Only Affects a Third of the Population

Why Cancer Disappears on its own due to White Blood Cells
[or, Cancer Cured by High IQ White Blood Cells]
Macklin Medical Mission                                                                                                                    The Canadian Cancer Centre

In a new series on cancer we will be publishing a few articles that deal with the human body’s own self-defence mechanisms that are either triggered by foods high in anti-oxidants or simply by the body’s own innate self defence via the white blood cells themselves without any “boosting” from lab work with the aid of T-cell modifications. In other words white blood cells with a high-IQ. Hence the reason that cancer does not affect all of us “being less prone” as they say without some genetic weakness or proclivity in the family gene pool. So here we go.
Several years ago, I had a man seeking asparagus for a friend who had cancer. He gave me a photocopied copy of an article, entitled, `Asparagus for cancer' printed in Cancer News Journal, December 1979. I will share it here, just as it was shared with me:

"I am a biochemist, and have specialized in the relation of diet to health for over 50 years. Several years ago, I learned of the discovery of Richard R. Vensal, D.D.S. that asparagus might cure cancer. Since then, I have worked with him on his project, and we have accumulated a number of favourable case histories. Here are a few examples.

Case No. 1, man with an almost hopeless case of Hodgkin's disease (cancer of the lymph glands) who was completely incapacitated. Within 1 year of starting the asparagus therapy, his doctors were unable to detect any signs of cancer, and he was back on a schedule of strenuous exercise.

Case No. 2, a successful businessman 68 years old who suffered from cancer of the bladder for 16 years. After years of medical treatments, including radiation without improvement, he went on asparagus. Within 3 months, examinations revealed that his bladder tumour had disappeared and that his kidneys were normal.

Case No. 3, a man who had lung cancer. On March 5th 1971 he was put on the operating table where they found lung cancer so widely spread that it was inoperable. The surgeon sewed him up and declared his case hopeless. On April 5th he heard about the asparagus therapy and immediately started taking it. By August, x-ray pictures revealed that all signs of the cancer had disappeared. He is back at his regular business routine.

Case No. 4, a woman who was troubled for a number of years with skin cancer. She finally developed different skin cancers which were diagnosed by a skin specialist as advanced. Within 3 months after starting on asparagus, her skin specialist said that her skin looked fine and no more skin lesions. This woman reported that the asparagus therapy also cured her kidney disease which started in 1949. She had over 10 operations for kidney stones, and was receiving government disability payments for an inoperable, terminal, kidney condition. She attributes the cure of this kidney trouble entirely to the asparagus.

I was not surprised at this result, as `The elements of materia medica', edited in 1854 by a Professor at the University of Pennsylvania, stated that asparagus was used as a popular remedy for kidney stones. He even referred to experiments, in 1739, on the power of asparagus in dissolving stones. We would have other case histories but the medical establishment has interfered with our obtaining some of the records. I am therefore appealing to readers to spread this good news and help us to gather a large number of case histories that will overwhelm the medical skeptics about this unbelievably simple and natural remedy.

For the treatment, asparagus should be cooked before using, and therefore canned asparagus is just as good as fresh. I have corresponded with the two leading canners of asparagus, Giant and Stokely, and I am satisfied that these brands contain no pesticides or preservatives. Place the cooked asparagus in a blender and liquefy to make a puree, and store in the refrigerator. Give the patient 4 full tablespoons twice daily, morning and evening. Patients usually show some improvement in from 2-4 weeks. It can be diluted with water and used as a cold or hot drink. This suggested dosage is based on present experience, but certainly larger amounts can do no harm and may be needed in some cases.

As a biochemist I am convinced of the old saying that `what cures can prevent'. Based on this theory, my wife and I have been using asparagus puree as a beverage with our meals. We take 2 tablespoons diluted in water to suit our taste with breakfast and with dinner. I take mine hot and my wife prefers hers cold. For years we have made it a practice to have blood surveys taken as part of our regular checkups.

The last blood survey, taken by a medical doctor who specializes in the nutritional approach to health, showed substantial improvements in all categories over the last one, and we can attribute these improvements to nothing but the asparagus drink. As a biochemist, I have made an extensive study of all aspects of cancer, and all of the proposed cures. As a result, I am convinced that asparagus fits in better with the latest theories about cancer.

Asparagus contains a good supply of protein called histones, which are believed to be active in controlling cell growth via the red blood cells. For that reason, I believe asparagus can be said to contain a substance that I call cell growth normalizer. That accounts for its action on cancer cells which are abnormal in the body and in acting as a natural general body necrotic on cells unknown to the red blood cells and as a tonic. In any event, regardless of theory, asparagus used as we suggest, is a harmless substance. 
The FDA cannot prevent you from using it and it may do you much good." It has been reported by the US National Cancer Institute, that asparagus is the highest tested food containing glutathione, which is considered one of the body's most potent anti-carcinogens and anti-oxidants carried through the body via the white blood cells. 
Its interesting that modern research into modified white blood cells with T-Cells to educate white blood cells to locate and recognize cancer cells for what they are is the path to go now. For some of us, this process is natural, for some of us, the white blood cells require a bio-nudge so to speak to kill the invasive cancer cells.
Your choice now is very simple – both you the private citizen and the private corporation can decide who and what to fund. The ethics are also simple – choose “inept” or “adept”. Thank you.
The Canadian Cancer Centre is a private sector initiative of The NANCY-GRIFFON Foundation of Canada to bring about funding for paediatric leukaemia care dealing with there cure for paediatric leukaemia with the use of the patient's white blood cells combined with either their T-Cells or B-Cells in conjunction with a biopsy of the cancer. The treatment through the use of white blood cells is to treat cancer for what is really is - a virus - and hence the name oncology. There is now radiology or burn treatment or chemotherapy which radically reduced the patient's auto-immue system - AND equally important for the patient - there are no side effects. 
We urgently ask for your assistance and your financial support for this private initiative by The Macklin Medical Mission and The NANCY-GRIFFON Foundation of Canada would be sincerely appreciated.  For our address and donation form we refer you to our website shown below. Thank you.

Eric J. Macklin   MBA., FICB, FCSI, FMA, UEChairmanThe Macklin Medical Mission    [Est 1886]The Nancy-Griffon Foundation [Est 1975]Website: www.canadiancancercenter.blogspot.comWebsite: www.nancygriffonfund.comYoutube:   Breast Cancer - A New Direction

© The Nancy-Griffon Foundation. All rights reserved.

The Canadian Cancer Centre is an initiative of The Nancy-Griffon Foundation (NGF), 1. CRS, 2. a tax exempt organization. Address: 53 Brookwood Drive, Suite 100, Barrie, Ontario, L4N0Z1


Thursday, September 11, 2014

Canadian Cancer Center - Blood Types Most A-Typical to Cancer

Blood Types indicate greater Risk for Cancer
Blood Types - A, B, AB, or O
Macklin Medical Mission

Offering a novel clue about the basic biology of pancreatic cancer, researchers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute have confirmed a decades-old discovery of a link between blood type and the risk of developing the disease.
The finding, published online by the Journal of the National Cancer Institute on March 10, is based on an analysis of blood type and pancreatic cancer occurrence in participants of two large health-tracking studies, the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study.
The new study demonstrates that while people’s overall risk of pancreatic cancer is relatively low — with nearly 40,000 new cases diagnosed annually in the United States, compared with nearly 150,000 new cases of colorectal cancer — people with Blood Types A, B, or AB were more likely to develop the disease than those with Type O.
“Except for several rare familial syndromes, the genetic factors that raise or lower an individual’s risk for pancreatic cancer are largely unknown,” said the study’s lead author, Brian Wolpin, an instructor in medicine at Harvard Medical School. “Studies done several decades ago suggested a link between blood type and the risk of various malignancies, including pancreatic cancer, but they were limited by the fact that they ‘looked back’ at cancers that had already occurred and involved relatively few cases. We wanted to see if the association held up using modern patient cohorts and research techniques.”
They found that, compared to participants with Type O blood, those with Type A had a 32 percent higher chance of incurring pancreatic cancer, those with type AB had a 51 percent higher chance, and those with Type B had a 72 percent higher chance.
Within the entire group, 17 percent of pancreatic cancers were attributable to inheriting a non-O blood group. But because the lifetime risk of developing the disease is relatively low (estimated at 1.3 percent) and the increased risk associated with blood type relatively modest, screening tests for pancreatic cancer risk are unlikely to be based on blood type alone. The real value of the findings is what they suggest about the inner workings of the disease, the authors say.
The four human blood groups are defined by the type of glycoproteins — confections of sugar and protein — found on the surface of red blood cells and other cells, including those in the pancreas. A gene known as ABO helps construct these glycoproteins by ordering the placement of sugar molecules on a protein “backbone” called the H antigen. The pattern formed by these sugars determines whether an individual’s blood Type is A, B, AB, or O. (In the O Type, no sugars are attached to the antigen.)
Experiments by other investigators have shown that normal pancreas cells carry a different pattern of these blood-type antigens than pancreatic tumour cells do, suggesting that changes in the ABO gene’s activity may occur as the cells become cancerous. Researchers speculate that alterations in the antigens may interfere with the cells’ ability to signal and adhere to one another, and with the immune system’s ability to detect abnormal cells — potentially setting the stage for cancer.
Blood-type antigens may also affect the level of inflammatory proteins in a person’s blood. Chronic inflammation has been linked to pancreatic cancer risk.
Intriguing as these findings are, they don’t necessarily prove a direct link between blood-type antigens and pancreatic cancer development, the authors assert. It is also possible that the ABO gene is merely a marker for other, nearby genes that are more directly involved in cancer development.
“The association between blood type and pancreatic cancer risk provides a new avenue for getting at the biological mechanisms that underlie the disease,” Wolpin says. “Understanding the biology will put us in a better position to intervene so the cancer doesn’t develop or progress.”
The study’s senior author is Charles Fuchs of Dana-Farber and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH). Co-authors include David Hunter and Edward Giovannucci of BWH and the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH); Andrew Chan of BWH and Massachusetts General Hospital; Patricia Hartge and Stephen Chanock of the National Cancer Institute; and Peter Kraft of the HSPH.
It would appear then that White blood cells from the Blood Group Type O, without sugars attached to the associated Red Blood cells, are either more successful or simply more resistant to the formation of cancer cells, or if cancer cells did appear in the body then the white cells are more successful in dealing with them.

BLOOD TYPE AND CANCER
Although there are probably over a thousand publications on the associations of blood groups and disease, many are based totally on statistical analyses. Most of the earlier studies have been controversial, because they were small studies and/or had inadequate controls and/or had been analyzed incorrectly. 
Nevertheless, it is difficult to argue with the general pattern that emerges from the large body of statistical data on malignancy, coagulation and infection. Some of the findings on microbe receptors, and the association with important immune proteins are most convincing and suggest that blood group antigens do play an important biological role: 
A role that is often completely unrelated to the red blood cells themselves but more so with the associated white blood cell itself. It can be said at the outset, that cancers in general tend to be associated with Group A, and slightly less strongly with Group B. With that, let's look at some trends among selected cancers with regard to blood type.

BREAST CANCER 
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women. And while the mortality rates are falling slightly for some sub-populations of women, it is still a potentially lethal adversary. Some researchers have even gone so far as to say that "blood groups were shown to possess a predictive value independent of other known prognostic factors" when discussing breast cancer. Other researchers have actually suggested that a degree of the susceptibility to breast cancer, from a gene perspective, might be a result of a breast cancer-susceptibility locus linked to the ABO locus located on band q34 of chromosome 9. Observation has been that blood Type A women have a generalized tendency to worse outcomes and a more rapid progression with this cancer.

BLADDER CANCER 
Generic bladder cancer appears to be an exception to the generalized observation of Type A's and overall cancer aggressiveness. In a study by Llopis et al, the researchers noticed that blood Group of Type O had a tendency to increased aggressiveness, higher tumour grade, and more relapses. Surprisingly, blood Type A individuals generally were less likely to have aggressive cancer and were somewhat protected against relapses of bladder cancer.
Blood Type O's generally had higher grade tumours and higher mortality rates. Other researchers have also observed similar trends, such as the blood type O tendency to higher grade tumours, larger tumours, progression to advanced disease, and increased rates of mortality (especially after 8 years).

COLON CANCER 
Colorectal cancer is among the most frequent cancers in the United States and Canada, with an estimated 133,000 new cases predicted (94,000 for colon and 39,000 for rectum). About 55,000 deaths from colorectal cancer are expected this year. Some of the most common risk factors include a family history of colorectal cancer; polyps or inflammatory bowel disease. Other risk factors can include physical inactivity, exposure to certain chemicals [as in the case of researchers] and a high-fat or low-fiber diet. If you eat steak, make sure you grill it to remove the fast content.
Colon cancer is actually one of the relatively few diseases with a significant association to an individual's Rh blood Type. Although Rh+ and Rh- individuals are about equally likely to have colon cancer, Rh- individuals are more likely to only have a localized disease, while Rh+ individuals are more likely to have metastatic disease. 
This suggests that Rh+ patients with colorectal cancer are less protected against tumour spread than Rh- patients which are more protected, especially with regard to regional lymph node metastases. 
Having said all that it appears that white blood cells working in conjunction with un-encumbered red blood cells, i.e. no blood sugars [Type O or a combined AB Type] with a Rh- factor is the favoured grouping in the fight against cancer; not to mention a healthy life style.
Your choice now is very simple – both you the private citizen and the private corporation can decide who and what to fund. The ethics are also simple – choose “inept” or “adept”. Thank you.
This is a private sector initiative. The Government will catch up only when it decides to do so. They are always late to the table. 
Thank you.
We urgently ask for your financial support for the Macklin Medical Mission and the Canadian Cancer Center would be sincerely appreciated.  In addition should you the reader or your group wish to hear more about the new cure for cancer please contact us to arrange for a speaking engagement date. Thank you.

Eric J. Macklin   MBA., FICB, FCSI, FMA, UE
Chairman
The Nancy-Griffon Foundation  [Est. 1975]
The Macklin Medical Mission    [Est. 1886]
Website: www.canadiancancercenter.blogspot.com
Website: www.nancygriffonfund.com
Youtube:   Breast Cancer - A New Direction

© The Nancy-Griffon Foundation. All rights reserved.

The Canadian Cancer Centre is an initiative of The Nancy-Griffon Foundation (NGF), 1. CRS, 2. a tax exempt organization. Address: 53 Brookwood Drive, Suite 100, Barrie, Ontario, L4N0Z1

Friday, August 22, 2014

Cure for Leukaemia Coming to Toronto 2015

The Cure to Cancer
The Macklin Medical Mission

Further to our discussions in earlier Blogs about the cure to cancer which has been available since the spring of 2012 and is now effective against leukaemia and melanoma, we would now like to discuss the success of ever larger clinical trails in the United States. The two major centres for research are of course the M.D. Anderson Center in Houston and of course the cancer research centre at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. For this discussion our focus will be on the very successful research being undertaken at the Abramson Family Cancer Research Center in Pittsburgh which has now expanded to the Children’s Hospital in Philadelphia (CHOP). In this regard their primary focus is children's leukaemia up to the age of 18 stages one through four - the cure.

So if you have a child with leukaemia - this is the answer to your prayers.

To retrace our steps for a bit before we get going you should remember that cancer is a virus and hence oncology. So just as we don.t treat the common virus such as flu with surgery or chemicals or radiology then why have we been treating cancef the population through our auto-immune r this way for the last 140 years. No illness can wipe out all of us and in the line of thinking cancer will be cured by a third osystem which is to say through our white blood cells. Both white and red blood cells form the hematological base of our bodies. Red blood cells carries oxygen and white blood cells or leukocytes, which are our army cells, do all the work requested by the auto-immune system.

having said that then it should be pointed out that at the very worst cancer can only kill about a third of the human population if left unchecked. A third of the population has a sufficiently strong enough auto-immune system combined with white blood cells to kill cancer in any form. Another third basically holds cancer in check and will die from other ailments, while the remaining third are the ones we see in cancer clinics. 

Even with chemo-therapy which has been around in some form or other since the mid 1940,s and radiology which has been around since 1886 (burn therapy) most of them will eventually die with a few induced clear periods and a greatly reduced auto-immune system combined with radiology but they will never be cured. The approach for the last 150 years since we knew what we were dealing with has been in completely the wrong direction.

The real oncologists are doctors with a Phd in Bio-medicine not the average doctor who calls him or herself an oncologist in the hospitals. In fact all doctors in Ontario, Canada in our hospitals are “contract doctors” who see each and every cancer patient as a $70,000 billing point. They can not proscribe any new procedures unless it has been fully approved by OHIP so as not to risk their licence - even when they know there is a very successful treatment in the United States.

As in our previous Blogs those with cancer are treated in the United States as if the the cancer is a virus and so it should be. In Canada, its pull out the scalpel, order up some radiology and start injection and proscribing chemicals. Lets destroy the auto-immune system system and hope for the best. Fantastic. Hell they are going to die anyways lets just help them on their way … and collect $75,000 per patient along the way. And the sliding scale of Stage One through Four is not helpful either. Canadian medicine at its best.

So what do we do here in Ontario other than pray for those with cancer. 

We bring the treatment of cancer as a virus up from the United States and bring it to one of our hospitals for clinical trials here right under the nose of the doctors here and our precious OHIP. 

No scalpel, no chemo and no radiology. Those can now be placed in the museum were they belong and we treat cancer as a virus - no mater what stage it is in and cure it within weeks - and without ANY side effects - other than being cured of course. 

So lets star with children’s leukaemia shall we. By all means. rather than marching our children with cancer off to the local witch doctors - oopps did I say that - lets just call them doctors without a cure. Treatment sure and compassion sure - BUT NO CURE. 

As a parent you chose - Going through hell with chemo and radiology and dying - or life without side effects and the cure. 

I’ve seen this offer go to two children with leukaemia here in Ontario and the doctors here dissuaded the parents from opting for the cure. How sad is that. Actually it’s worse than sad - its pathetic but they kept their billing point at $75,000.

This is 2014 - next year being 2015 the clinical trial studies are being brought up to Canada as I have previously induced - under licence of course - and we expect and have requested that Toronto Sikc Kids will be one of them. 

The treatment for leukaemia is so successful in the cure rate that it does”t matter which stage the patient is in with cancer. Unbelievable. Even stage four and with tumours. All gone in six to eight weeks. Yes GONE - CURED. So you have a child with a four pound tumour - try lifting four pounds of butter and image it gone in eight (8) weeks and your child is cured - then image the current cancer treatment process as it stand now. 

You are the parent - you chose - take your time - its only your child’s life - not hard is it.

I know the doctors who both created the cure (you can read about it on Google - New England Journal of Medicine) and the lead doctors at the Children’s Hospital in Philadelphia. They are the best of the best. Actually they are the very best of the very best. AND they are bringing it here next year.    

So what is the cost to you the patient. Other than the cost for the stay in Toronto - McDonald’s House will not be able to handle everyone - is the cost of housing for the family - the cost of the treatment is carried by the pharmaceutical company and the cost of the clinical trials itself. In most case its carried by a company in the United States under a licensing agreement with the hospital and the company. 
Just to have your case reviewed and profiled in the US would cost your $25,000 US funds. here ists nothing and for once OHIP actually is beneficial for the cancer patient. The actual process is discussed in a previous Blog so we don’t need to do that again. 

So what’s in kit for the Macklin Medical Mission? Nothing. Our Foundation is one of the oldest medical charities in Canada having stated in 1886 by Dr William E Macklin and Dr. Alfred H Macklin from the university of Toronto. Their story is also discussed in a previous Blog. Just a couple of doctors who graduated at he very top of their Class. The very best of the very best. 

So to support this move for the clinical trials from Philadelphia to Toronto - to bring the cure to cancer for leukaemia - we will be seeking your donations to help cover the cost of the patient’s stay in Toronto.

One other thing we discovered over our years in the charitable business in Canada is that 96% of all donations come from individuals - company donations even on a matching basis from corporations amour to a mere 3% - and that is in a good year. Why because the cancer cure helps people not companies.

And finally donating money to hospitals and the Canadian Cancer Center without proper financial guidance, which has been the case for over 100 years, means also supporting countless layers of bureaucracy and countless chemical companies and suppliers of out of date radiology machines as well as countless millions in salaries and benefits long before it benefits children. Countless lotteries have also wasted and continue to waste money and donations and are expensive to operate - the proof is that they simply have noting to show for the countless millions raised in a myriad of venues and donated to them - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! - on-going so called “treatments” without a cure IS nothing.

So yes - we are asking for your generous donation - to help kids be cured of leukaemia. Using the]same process will also cure breast cancer - or any other cancer and that’s next … 

So if you have cancer or know of anyone who has cancer - especially children with leukaemia- the door is now open and this is the way-out.   

*    *    *    *    *    *

However, just as it is in the United States, 95% of all cancer funding comes from individuals just like you and me. There are a number of ways in which you can make a donation to this program at the Macklin Medical Mission sponsored by the Nancy-Griffon Foundation, visit the following:

1.  www.thenancygriffonfund.com    and print the donations forms on the web page and mail it to us
2.  Or send your draft or money order to the CIBC at 23 Mapleview Dr West in Barrie [Manager]
3.  Or send your draft or money order to the TD at 60 Mapleview Dr West in Barrie [Manager]

All personal donations should be by way of a Money Order or a Draft drawn on a Canadian or American bank and the minimum is $100 in order to receive a tax receipt. Corporate donations can be made by way of a corporate cheque. Corporate tax receipts start at $1000. Please include your name and return address. 

If you work for a corporation, please ask your company to support this new program. We all know some one who has died from cancer, is dying from cancer or is in the process of receiving treatment for cancer and is undergoing radiation of chemotherapy or both with the possibility of surgery. Its time to stop and look at what the future holds for them and the rest of us. One both you the private citizen and the private corporation can decide who and what to fund. The ethics are also simple – choose “inept” or “adept”. The larger labs have failed us – thought they can replicate us; the larger cancer fund raising programs have failed because they failed to finance the smaller labs. It’s the story of the small Dr. Banting lab in day, we too may walk in their shoes. 
Your choice now is very simple – this is a defining moment -the little town of Alliston which discovered insulin so many years ago - all over again. But now you know, thankfully to the Macklin Medical Mission and the internet. 
Like so much else in cancer research - this is a private sector initiative - and a very successful one. The Government including OHIP will catch up only when it decides to do so. They are always late to the table. It’s your choice now, whether this takes three years, whether it takes four years, whether it takes five years; and how many more children and others have to die from cancer when they don’t have to. 

But clinical trails will be here next year. And due to current financial restrictions you will not find this arriving at your front door or your local mail box as a solicitation letter. This is it. Like everything else we do, we are only using modern technology.
We urgently ask for your financial support for the Macklin Medical Mission and its initiative for the Canadian Cancer Centre. It will be sincerely appreciated.  In addition should you the reader or your group wish to hear more about the new cure for cancer please contact us to arrange for a speaking engagement. Thank you.

Eric J. Macklin  MBA., FICB, FCSI, FMA, UE
Chairman
The Macklin Medical Mission    [Est. 1886]
The Nancy-Griffon Foundation [Est. 1975]
Website: www.nancygriffonfund.com
Website: www.canadiancancercenter.blogspot.com
Youtube:   Breast Cancer - A New Direction

© The Nancy-Griffon Foundation. All rights reserved.

The Canadian Cancer Centre is an initiative of The Nancy-Griffon Foundation (NGF), 1. CRS, 2. a tax exempt organization. Address: 53 Brookwood Drive, Suite 100, Barrie, Ontario, L4N0Z1